1 |
The impact of intervention dose form on oral language outcomes for children with developmental language disorder
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
The influence of quantitative intervention dosage on oral language outcomes for children with developmental language disorder: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Reflective practice across speech and language therapy and education: a protocol for an integrative review
|
|
|
|
In: HRB Open Res (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Moving beyond traditional understandings of evidence-based practice: A Total Evidence and Knowledge Approach (TEKA) to treatment evaluation and clinical decision making in speech-language pathology
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
The influence of quantitative intervention dosage on oral language outcomes for children with developmental language disorder: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Moving Beyond Traditional Understandings of Evidence-Based Practice: A Total Evidence and Knowledge Approach (TEKA) to Treatment Evaluation and Clinical Decision Making in Speech-Language Pathology
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Consequential differences in perspectives and practices concerning children with developmental language disorders: an integrative review
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
What our hands tell us: a 2 year follow-up investigating outcomes in subgroups of children with language delay
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: terminology
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study. Identifying language impairments in children
|
|
Norbury, Courtenay; Leonard, Laurence; McCartney, Elspeth; O'Hare, Anne; Baird, Gillian; Thompson, Paul A.; Soppitt, Richard; Gallagher, Aoife; Cohen, Nancy; Taylor, Cate; Bellair, Jude; Lynham, Stephanie; Westerveld, Marleen; Grist, Mandy; Clegg, Judy; Cardy, Janis Oram; Lascelles, Linda; Whitehouse, Andrew; Speake, Jane; Purdy, Suzanne; Restrepo, Laida; Stringer, Helen; Redmond, Sean; Carter, Glenn; Dockrell, Julie; Mathura, Narad; O'Toole, Ciara; Murphy, Carol-Anne; Adams, Catherine; Volden, Joanne; Tager-Flusberg, Helen; Huneke, Alison; Gore-Langton, Emma; Snow, Pamela; Reilly, Sheena; Brownlie, Elizabeth; Law, James; Tomblin, Bruce; Arnold, Elina Mainela; McKean, Cristina; Slonims, Vicky; Krishnan, Saloni; McNeill, Brigid; Hartshorne, Mary; Archibald, Lisa; Ebbels, Susan; Rice, Mabel; Tannock, Rosemary; Kedge, Sally; Klee, Thomas; Joanisse, Marc; Greenhalgh, Trisha; Snowling, Margaret J.; Paul, Rhea; Bishop, Dorothy Vera M.; Bauer, Ann; Boyle, Christopher; Gibbs, Simon; Clark, Becky; Spencer, Sarah; Conti-Ramsden, Gina; Dunn, Janet; Morgan, Angela. - : Public Library Science, 2016
|
|
Abstract:
Delayed or impaired language development is a common developmental concern, yet there is little agreement about the criteria used to identify and classify language impairments in children. Children's language difficulties are at the interface between education, medicine and the allied professions, who may all adopt different approaches to conceptualising them. Our goal in this study was to use an online Delphi technique to see whether it was possible to achieve consensus among professionals on appropriate criteria for identifying children who might benefit from specialist services. We recruited a panel of 59 experts representing ten disciplines (including education, psychology, speech-language therapy/pathology, paediatrics and child psychiatry) from English-speaking countries (Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, United Kingdom and USA). The starting point for round 1 was a set of 46 statements based on articles and commentaries in a special issue of a journal focusing on this topic. Panel members rated each statement for both relevance and validity on a seven-point scale, and added free text comments. These responses were synthesised by the first two authors, who then removed, combined or modified items with a view to improving consensus. The resulting set of statements was returned to the panel for a second evaluation (round 2). Consensus (percentage reporting 'agree' or 'strongly agree') was at least 80 percent for 24 of 27 round 2 statements, though many respondents qualified their response with written comments. These were again synthesised by the first two authors. The resulting consensus statement is reported here, with additional summary of relevant evidence, and a concluding commentary on residual disagreements and gaps in the evidence base. ; This work was funded by Wellcome Trust (http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/) grant 082498/Z/07/Z to DVMB. (082498/Z/07/Z - Wellcome Trust; NF-SI-0512-10031 - National Institute for Health Research) ; Published version
|
|
Keyword:
6-year-old children; Age-children; Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; Australia; Autism spectrum disorder; Canada; CATALISE consortium; Childhood aphasia; Cochlear implants; Delphi technique; Dynamic assessment; Humans; Interdisciplinary studies; Ireland; Language disorders; Multidisciplinary sciences; New Zealand; Outcome measure; Preschool children; Science & technology; United Kingdom; Young children
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158753 http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000380005400115&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=6e74115fe3da270499c3d65c9b17d654 https://hdl.handle.net/2144/33290
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
13 |
CATALISE : a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study. Identifying language impairments in children
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Fluidity of language profiles in a follow-up study :is early gesture predictive of later language profile?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Early language delay and later language development: a longitudinal study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Gesture in children with early language delay as a predictor of later language profiles: a follow-up study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Assessment of verb argument structure in children using a story retell task: comparing performance and potential clinical utility from unprompted responses versus graduated prompting
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Verb alternations and event structure in children with specific language impairment compared with typically developing children. What can we learn from the story of Cinderella?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Too young for meta? The use of shape coding, rehearsal and comprehension monitoring to treat oral comprehension deficits in a young school age child: a pilot study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Oral language comprehension difficulties in school-aged children: a pilot single case study to investigate the efficacy of a combined intervention approach
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|